Table 2

Effects of five Chinese medicine decoctions on liver hydroxyproline (Hyp) content in DMN-induced liver fibrosis of rats

Group
Group size (n)
Hyp content μg/g mean (SD)
Fibrotic grade*
95% CI of U**








0
1
2
3
4


Control
10
179.36(9.90)▲▲
10
0
0
0
0
(-0.110 to 0.228)▲▲
2-week DMN
6
289.06 (26.95)▲▲
0
0
4
2
0
(0.051 to 0.486)▲▲
DMN + water
12
641.71 (54.22)△△
0
0
0
3
9
(0.586 to 0.894)△△
DMN + YCHT
12
434.16 (25.39)
0
0
5
6
1
(0.226 to 0.548)
DMN + XYXT
12
586.91 (37.53)
0
0
0
5
7
(0.522 to 0.829)
DMN + HQT
12
559.04 (47.06)
0
0
0
8
4
(0.580 to 0.734)
DMN + YGJ
12
647.17 (64.73)
0
0
1
6
5
(0.435 to 0.743)
DMN + XCHT
10
636.35 (48.53)
0
0
1
7
2
(0.333 to 0.671)

*: grade 0: normal; grade 1: very slight; grade 2: slight; grade 3: moderate; grade 4: severe. Data are expressed as numbers of animals with each fibrotic grade.

**: 95% confidence interval of the U values obtained from ridit analysis

P < 0.05 ▲▲P < 0.01 (vs DMN+ water)

P < 0.05 △△P < 0.01 (vs 2-week DMN)

YCHT: Yinchenhao Tang

XYXT: Xiayuxue Tang

HQT:Huangqi Tang

YGJ: Yiguang Jian

XCHT: Xiaochaihu Tang

Results are expressed as mean (SD).

Liu et al. Chinese Medicine 2008 3:1   doi:10.1186/1749-8546-3-1