Table 5 |
|||
|
Simultaneous determination of eight markers in three commercial samples of Dachengqi Tang |
|||
|
Marker |
Content (mg/g) |
||
|
Batch 1 |
Batch 2 |
Batch 3 |
|
|
|
|||
|
Naringin |
3.89 (0.07) |
3.82 (0.07) |
3.79 (0.06) |
|
Hesperidin |
11.27 (0.23) |
11.04 (0.22) |
10.87 (0.22) |
|
Aloe emodin |
1.72 (0.08) |
1.69 (0.07) |
1.77 (0.08) |
|
Rhein |
0.88 (0.05) |
0.83 (0.03) |
0.86 (0.05) |
|
Honokial |
1.25 (0.08) |
1.28 (0.07) |
1.24 (0.08) |
|
Magnolol |
1.06 (0.07) |
1.10 (0.08) |
1.16 (0.06) |
|
Emodin |
2.39 (0.16) |
2.54 (0.11) |
2.50 (0.11) |
|
Chrysophanol |
0.52 (0.03) |
0.57 (0.01) |
0.55 (0.01) |
|
|
|||
|
Values are mean (SD) n = 3. Single factor ANOVA was performed on each component. No significant difference was observed in the measured concentration of each marker in three batches of DT. |
|||
|
Tang et al. Chinese Medicine 2008 3:5 doi:10.1186/1749-8546-3-5 |
|||