Table 12 |
||||||||
|
Statistical Results of TPR, TNR and G-means by using SVM and KNN with RAD and MRMR or without symptom selection |
||||||||
|
Syndrome |
1 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
Average |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
No Symptom Selection- SVM |
TPR |
0.708 |
0.463 |
0.729 |
0.472 |
0.799 |
0.906 |
0.680 |
|
|
||||||||
|
TNR |
0.411 |
0.770 |
0.535 |
0.602 |
0.516 |
0.667 |
0.583 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
G-m |
0.539 |
0.597 |
0.625 |
0.533 |
0.642 |
0.777 |
0.630 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
RAD-SVM |
TPR |
0.723 |
0.518 |
0.786 |
0.588 |
0.796 |
0.771 |
0.713 |
|
|
||||||||
|
TNR |
0.429 |
0.781 |
0.547 |
0.536 |
0.592 |
0.865 |
0.609 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
G-m |
0.557 |
0.636 |
0.656 |
0.561 |
0.686 |
0.817 |
0.652 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
MRMR-SVM |
TPR |
0.955 |
0.337 |
0.131 |
0.412 |
0.955 |
0.020 |
0.468 |
|
|
||||||||
|
TNR |
0.070 |
0.893 |
0.970 |
0.704 |
0.027 |
0.970 |
0.606 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
G-m |
0.259 |
0.549 |
0.356 |
0.539 |
0.161 |
0.141 |
0.334 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
No Symptom Selection- KNN |
TPR |
0.757 |
0.553 |
0.439 |
0.461 |
0.826 |
0.534 |
0.595 |
|
|
||||||||
|
TNR |
0.380 |
0.795 |
0.732 |
0.657 |
0.673 |
0.784 |
0.670 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
G-m |
0.536 |
0.663 |
0.567 |
0.550 |
0.746 |
0.647 |
0.631 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
RAD-KNN |
TPR |
0.749 |
0.670 |
0.509 |
0.485 |
0.887 |
0.522 |
0.607 |
|
|
||||||||
|
TNR |
0.391 |
0.712 |
0.729 |
0.663 |
0.704 |
0.851 |
0.706 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
G-m |
0.541 |
0.691 |
0.601 |
0.567 |
0.790 |
0.667 |
0.643 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
MRMR-KNN |
TPR |
1.000 |
0.401 |
0.170 |
0.354 |
0.942 |
0.161 |
0.505 |
|
|
||||||||
|
TNR |
0.146 |
0.901 |
0.981 |
0.783 |
0.018 |
0.897 |
0.621 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
G-m |
0.382 |
0.601 |
0.409 |
0.526 |
0.130 |
0.379 |
0.405 |
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Li et al. Chinese Medicine 2012 7:9 doi:10.1186/1749-8546-7-9 |
||||||||