<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1749-8546-2-9</ui>
   <ji>1749-8546</ji>
   <fm>
		<dochead>Review</dochead>
		<bibl>
			<title>
				<p>DNA methods for identification of Chinese medicinal materials</p>
			</title>
			<aug>
				<au id="A1">
					<snm>Yip</snm>
					<mnm>Ying</mnm>
					<fnm>Pui</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>hkanna2-paper@yahoo.com.hk</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A2">
					<snm>Chau</snm>
					<mnm>Fai</mnm>
					<fnm>Chi</fnm>
					<insr iid="I2"/>
					<email>chaucf@nchu.edu.tw</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A3">
					<snm>Mak</snm>
					<mnm>Yin</mnm>
					<fnm>Chun</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>cymak@govtlab.gov.hk</email>
				</au>
				<au id="A4" ca="yes">
					<snm>Kwan</snm>
					<mnm>Shan</mnm>
					<fnm>Hoi</fnm>
					<insr iid="I1"/>
					<email>hoishankwan@cuhk.edu.hk</email>
				</au>
			</aug>
			<insg>
				<ins id="I1">
					<p>Department of Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong</p>
				</ins>
				<ins id="I2">
					<p>Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, 250 Kuokuang Road, Taichung 40227, Taiwan</p>
				</ins>
			</insg>
			<source>Chinese Medicine</source>
			<issn>1749-8546</issn>
			<pubdate>2007</pubdate>
			<volume>2</volume>
			<issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>9</fpage>
			<url>http://www.cmjournal.org/content/2/1/9</url>
			<xrefbib>
				<pubidlist>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">17803808</pubid>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1186/1749-8546-2-9</pubid>
				</pubidlist>
			</xrefbib>
		</bibl>
		<history>
			<rec>
				<date>
					<day>11</day>
					<month>7</month>
					<year>2006</year>
				</date>
			</rec>
			<acc>
				<date>
					<day>05</day>
					<month>9</month>
					<year>2007</year>
				</date>
			</acc>
			<pub>
				<date>
					<day>05</day>
					<month>9</month>
					<year>2007</year>
				</date>
			</pub>
		</history>
		<cpyrt>
			<year>2007</year>
			<collab>Yip et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.</collab>
			<note>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (<url>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0</url>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note>
		</cpyrt>
		<abs>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Abstract</p>
				</st>
				<p>As adulterated and substituted Chinese medicinal materials are common in the market, therapeutic effectiveness of such materials cannot be guaranteed. Identification at species-, strain- and locality-levels, therefore, is required for quality assurance/control of Chinese medicine. This review provides an informative introduction to DNA methods for authentication of Chinese medicinal materials. Technical features and examples of the methods based on sequencing, hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are described and their suitability for different identification objectives is discussed.</p>
			</sec>
		</abs>
	</fm>
   <bdy>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Background</p>
			</st>
			<p>Chinese medicinal materials have long been used for disease prevention and therapy in China and are becoming increasingly popular in the West <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B2">2</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. The annual sales of herbal medicines have amounted to US $7 billion in Europe and those in the United States increased from US $200 million in 1988 to more than US $3.3 billion in 1997 <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Despite the belief that Chinese medicines are of natural origin which have few adverse effects, there have been numerous reports on adverse effects associated with herbal remedies <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. One possible cause is the variable quality of both crude medicinal materials (plants, fungi, animal parts and minerals) and Chinese proprietary medicines. Many substitutes and adulterants are in the market due to their lower costs or misidentification caused by similarity in appearance with their authentic counterparts. It is particularly difficult to identify those medicines derived from processed parts of organisms and commercial products in powder and/or tablet forms. Some of the adulterants or substitutes caused intoxications and even deaths <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Moreover, it is also common for several species to have the same name <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B10">10</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>
					<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Inadvertent substitution of these species can also lead to intoxication <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Adulterants and substitutes may have completely different or weaker pharmacological actions compared with their authentic counterparts; even different species of the same genus may have totally different actions. For example, <it>Panax ginseng </it>(<it>Renshen</it>), considered to be 'hot', is used in 'yang-deficient' conditions, while <it>Panax quinquefolius </it>(<it>Xiyangshen</it>) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, considered to be 'cool ', is used in 'yin-deficient 'conditions. Authentication of Chinese medicinal materials is the key to ensure the therapeutic potency, minimize unfair trade and raise consumers' confidence towards Chinese medicine in general.</p>
			<p>Locality-level identification is also of great importance to ensure highest therapeutic effectiveness. '<it>Daodi</it>' is a Chinese term describing the highest quality of herbal materials that are collected from the best region and at the best time <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Chinese medicinal materials cultivated in different localities differ in therapeutic effectiveness. For example, it is well accepted that <it>Atractylodes macrocephala </it>(<it>Baizhu</it>) grown in Jiangning, Jiangshu province, China is more effective than those grown in Zhejiang and Jiangxi provinces <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. <it>Condonopsis pilosula </it>(<it>Dangshen</it>) grown in Shanxi province is generally considered to be more potent than those grown in other provinces <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>. Furthermore, samples from the same localities are probably of the same strains; therefore, origin identification helps select the best strains of Chinese medicinal materials. There have been a number of studies investigating medicinal materials grown in different geographical regions. <it>Codonopsis pilosula </it>(<it>Dangshen</it>) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, <it>Panax notoginseng </it>(<it>Sanqi</it>) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>, <it>Bufo bufo gargarizans </it>(<it>Chansu</it>) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> and <it>Paeonia lactiflora </it>(<it>Baishao</it>, or <it>Chishao</it>) <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
				</abbrgrp> are just a few examples.</p>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>DNA methods for identification of Chinese medicinal materials</p>
				</st>
				<p>One of the most reliable methods for identification of Chinese medicinal materials is by analyzing DNA that is present in all organisms. DNA methods are suitable for identifying Chinese medicinal materials because genetic composition is unique for each individual irrespective of the physical forms of samples, and is less affected by age <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, physiological conditions, environmental factors <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, harvest <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, storage and processing <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B24">24</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B26">26</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B27">27</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B28">28</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B29">29</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B30">30</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B31">31</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. DNA extracted from leaves, stems or roots of a herb all carry the same genetic information <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. In general, extracted DNA is stable and can be stored at -20&#176;C for a long period of time (about 3&#8211;5 years), hence eliminating the time constraint in performing the analysis. A small amount of sample is sufficient for analysis and this is advantageous for analyzing medicinal materials that are expensive or in limited supply <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B32">32</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p>
				<p>In terms of the mechanisms involved, DNA methods can be classified into three types, namely polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based, hybridization-based and sequencing-based.</p>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>PCR-based method</p>
					</st>
					<p>PCR-based methods use amplification of the region(s) of interest in the genome; subsequent gel electrophoresis is performed to size and/or score the amplification products.</p>
					<p>PCR-based methods have the advantage of requiring tiny amounts of samples for analysis due to the high sensitivity of PCR. However, PCR inhibitors (e.g. polyphenols, pigments and acidic polysaccharides) may be present in DNA samples, thereby hampering amplification. Moreover, PCR is prone to contamination because of its high sensitivity <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. DNA from contaminating bacteria or fungi in some improperly-stored medicinal samples may be co-amplified if the stringency used is not high enough.</p>
					<p>PCR-based methods include sequence characterized amplified regions (SCAR), amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS), simple sequence repeat (SSR) analysis and DNA fingerprinting methods.</p>
					<sec>
						<st>
							<p>DNA fingerprinting</p>
						</st>
						<p>DNA fingerprinting refers to simultaneous analysis of multiple loci in a genome to produce a unique pattern for identification. These methods include PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), random-primed PCR (RP-PCR), direct amplification of length polymorphism (DALP), inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and directed amplification of minisatellite-region DNA (DAMD). Except PCR-RFLP and DAMD, these methods share the following characteristics:</p>
						<p>&#8226; Suitable for Chinese medicinal materials which lack DNA sequence information, as they do not require prior sequence knowledge</p>
						<p>&#8226; Large numbers of loci can be screened in a short time</p>
						<p>&#8226; Require DNA of good quality, in terms of DNA integrity and the absence of PCR inhibitors</p>
						<p>&#8226; Unknown origins of the sequences</p>
						<p>&#8226; Can be used to show the phylogenetic relationships among organisms within the same genus</p>
						<sec>
							<st>
								<p>PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP)</p>
							</st>
							<p>PCR-RFLP uses endonucleases to digest PCR products of regions with sequence polymorphisms. By using an endonuclease which recognizes and cleaves at the polymorphic sites, the digestion of a longer PCR fragment into smaller fragments will change the banding pattern. PCR-RFLP has been used for authentication of <it>Panax </it>species <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, <it>Fritillaria pallidiflora </it><abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B37">37</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, <it>Atractylodes </it>species <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and differentiation of <it>Codonopsis </it>from their adulterants <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B39">39</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>.</p>
							<p>Screening PCR products by using various restriction enzymes can be an alternative of sequencing to find out polymorphic regions among samples <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B40">40</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. This method is more reproducible than random priming methods, but it is limited by the degree of polymorphism among individuals within a species <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. The loss of restriction sites associated with degraded DNA, creation or deletion of restriction sites due to intra-specific variation <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, and the presence of enzyme inhibitors may lead to incomplete digestion.</p>
						</sec>
						<sec>
							<st>
								<p>Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)</p>
							</st>
							<p>AFLP involves restriction of genomic DNA and ligation to adapters, selective amplification of restriction fragments using primers containing the adapter sequences and selective bases at the 3' terminals, and subsequent gel analysis of the amplified fragments <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B41">41</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. The number of resulting fragments in this multi-locus approach is determined by the number and composition of selective nucleotides as well as the complexity of the genomes. Polymorphisms detected may be caused by a single nucleotide change at the restriction site or 3' end of the primer binding site, insertions and deletions as well as rearrangements. It has been used for authentication <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and studying genetic diversity <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B43">43</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B44">44</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B45">45</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B46">46</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> of Chinese medicines.</p>
							<p>AFLP combines the advantages of the reliability of RFLP and the power of PCR. The high reproducibility resulting from stringent reaction conditions enables the use of polymorphic bands in developing cultivar-specific probes, which can then be used for easy identification <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. By using adapter sequences, fingerprints can be generated without prior sequence knowledge. The number of amplified fragments can be controlled by changing the restriction enzymes and the number of selective bases and thus this method is suitable for DNA of any origin and complexity. It is efficient in revealing polymorphisms even between closely related individuals <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. The number of polymorphisms per reaction can be higher than RFLP or RAPD <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B47">47</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B49">49</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Three steps and four different primers are required for analysis of complex genomes <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Imperfect ligation or incomplete restriction of DNA will lead to artifactual polymorphisms because of partial fragments <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Moreover, if the sequence homology between two organisms is less than 90%, their fingerprints will share very few common fragments <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B50">50</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>.</p>
						</sec>
						<sec>
							<st>
								<p>Random-primed PCR (RP-PCR)</p>
							</st>
							<p>RP-PCR involves amplification at low annealing temperatures using one or two random primers in each PCR reaction to generate unique fingerprints (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). At reduced stringency, the arbitrary primers bind to a number of sites randomly distributed in the genomic DNA template although the primer and the template sequences may not be perfectly matched. Each anonymous and reproducible fragment is derived from a region of genome that contains, on opposite DNA strands, two primer binding sites located within an amplifiable distance from each other. Polymorphisms are resulted from sequence differences which inhibit primer binding or interfere with amplification. The presence or absence of bands is scored and the results can be used for calculating genetic distances <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B52">52</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and constructing phylogenetic trees <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B54">54</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> to study the relationships among samples.</p>
							<fig id="F1">
								<title>
									<p>Figure 1</p>
								</title>
								<caption>
									<p>RP-PCR, DALP and DAMD</p>
								</caption>
								<text>
									<p><b>RP-PCR, DALP and DAMD</b>. RP-PCR employs low stringency conditions and unlabeled arbitrary primers, while DALP employs high stringency conditions and both fluorescent-labeled and unlabeled arbitrary primers. DAMD employs high stringency conditions and an unlabeled primer targeting repeat regions.</p>
								</text>
								<graphic file="1749-8546-2-9-1"/>
							</fig>
							<p>Techniques based on this concept include arbitrarily primed PCR (AP-PCR) <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B55">55</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B56">56</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and DNA amplification fingerprinting (DAF) <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B57">57</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. AP-PCR employs primers of approximately 20 nucleotides long and only two relaxed PCR cycles while RAPD employs primers of 10 nucleotides long and all the PCR cycles are relaxed, and DAF employs primers of 5&#8211;8 nucleotides long and all the PCR cycles are relaxed with lower stringency than that of RAPD. AP-PCR results are the most reproducible among these three methods.</p>
							<p>As any part of the genome, including non-coding regions, may be amplified, these methods can be used to discriminate between closely related individuals. RP-PCR have been used for marker-assisted selection in breeding <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B58">58</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, identification at the individual, variety, strain and species levels <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B59">59</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B61">61</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B62">62</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, study of genetic diversity <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B63">63</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B64">64</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and differentiation of cultivated and wild samples <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B65">65</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B66">66</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. It has been used to authenticate Chinese medicines <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B52">52</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B67">67</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B68">68</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B69">69</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and identify their geographical origins <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B70">70</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B71">71</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>.</p>
							<p>RP-PCR is a quick and easy method to screen a large number of loci for DNA polymorphisms in a single PCR. Polymorphic markers can be generated rapidly without sequence information. The marker sequences obtained from RP-PCR can also be used to design specific oligonucleotides to be used in SCAR assay <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B72">72</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Moreover, any single primer can be used, including those for specific PCR amplification or sequencing. However, there are some limitations in RP-PCR. Firstly, it is sensitive to the reaction conditions, including the amounts of templates <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B73">73</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B74">74</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B75">75</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and magnesium ions <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B76">76</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B77">77</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, the sequences of primers <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B78">78</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B79">79</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B80">80</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B81">81</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, the presence of glycerol <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B82">82</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and the quantity and quality of the polymerase <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B83">83</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Thermocyclers may also influence the banding patterns due to their different ramp time from the annealing step to the extension step <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B84">84</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B85">85</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Therefore, results generated with different reaction conditions cannot be compared directly. Secondly, the reproducibility of RP-PCR patterns can be influenced by the quality, quantity and purity of DNA templates <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B86">86</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B87">87</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Some researchers consider this to have a more significant effect to reproducibility than other factors such as enzyme quality or buffer conditions which may affect only the relative intensities of bands, but do not cause a band to appear or disappear <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B88">88</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. The number of bands produced can be greatly increased by adding bovine serum albumin (BSA), which prevents various contaminants in impure DNA from binding to <it>Taq </it>polymerase <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B89">89</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> thereby stabilizing the polymerase <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B90">90</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. This method is, therefore, unreliable for identification of medicinal materials with impure or degraded DNA <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B91">91</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> caused by processing or long storage time. Amplification should be performed using DNA templates at two concentrations with at least two-fold difference <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B92">92</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> to ensure reproducibility of the results. Thirdly, as arbitrary primers and low stringencies are used, DNA from any organisms including DNA from contaminants can be amplified, thereby contributing to the banding pattern. Fourthly, as different loci in the genome have different degree of homology among samples (e.g. coding regions are more conserved), the number of loci to be included should be large enough to reveal differences in the whole genome. Fifthly, fragments of the same size in the fingerprints are not necessarily the same sequence <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B93">93</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. It should not be assumed that bands of a similar size are homologous sequences, especially when distant species are being examined. The extent of polymorphism is indicated by the presence and absence of bands of particular sizes and thus applying RP-PCR on high taxonomic levels leads to an increase in variance of genetic distance estimates.</p>
						</sec>
						<sec>
							<st>
								<p>Direct amplification of length polymorphism (DALP)</p>
							</st>
							<p>DALP uses a selective forward primer containing a 5' core sequence (e.g. M13 universal sequencing primer) plus additional bases at the 3' end and a common reverse primer (e.g. M13 reverse primer) to generate multibanded patterns in denaturing polyacrylamide gel <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. For identification of fragments having two different ends, two PCR reactions are performed for each sample, with each reaction containing either of the primers labeled. The common bands in both labeled reactions are the products having two different ends. Any of these bands can be excised from the gel and sequenced directly using forward or reverse primers. After sequencing the polymorphic bands among the samples, species- or strain-specific primers can be designed. These specific primers can then be used for mono-locus amplification (i.e. sequence-tagged site) (Figure <figr fid="F2">2</figr>). DALP is similar to AP-PCR except that it uses higher stringency (i.e. higher annealing temperature, lower concentration of magnesium ion and fewer cycles). At this stringency, a given arbitrary primer will anneal to fixed sites across experiments <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Moreover, the polymorphic bands can be sequenced directly to further design species- or strain-specific primers, whereas in AP-PCR the two ends of the products contain the same primer sequence. For this reason, AP-PCR products cannot be sequenced directly (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). DALP has been used to detect polymorphisms between species <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B94">94</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and between strains <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B48">48</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and to authenticate <it>Panax ginseng </it>(<it>Renshen</it>) and <it>Panax quinquefolius </it>(<it>Xiyangshen</it>) <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B95">95</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. It has also been used in mapping for marker-assisted selection in breeding <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B96">96</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>.</p>
							<fig id="F2">
								<title>
									<p>Figure 2</p>
								</title>
								<caption>
									<p>DALP</p>
								</caption>
								<text>
									<p><b>DALP</b>. DALP employs two separate PCRs, each containing one of the primers labeled, for each sample. After separation in denaturing polyacrylamide gel, bands shared by the two reactions are products with different primers at both ends. These bands are compared with those of other samples in order to find the polymorphic bands among the samples. Polymorphic bands can be excised from the gel and sequenced directly using either of the primers.</p>
								</text>
								<graphic file="1749-8546-2-9-2"/>
							</fig>
							<p>Identification of polymorphic products can be done easily by searching in public sequence databases. However, each sample must be subject to two separate PCR reactions by alternative labeling of the two primers. This requires an additional step apart from identifying polymorphic bands among samples. Unlike RP-PCR, much time and effort are required in screening for suitable primer pairs and optimizing primer ratio <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B97">97</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>.</p>
						</sec>
						<sec>
							<st>
								<p>Inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR)</p>
							</st>
							<p>ISSR <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B98">98</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> employs a primer containing simple repeat sequences for PCR amplification to generate fingerprints (Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr>). The primer can be 5' or 3' anchored by selective nucleotides to prevent internal priming of the primer and to amplify only a subset of the targeted inter-repeat regions, thereby reducing the number of bands produced by priming of dinucleotide inter-repeat region <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B98">98</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B99">99</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B100">100</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Therefore regions between inversely oriented closely spaced microsatellites are amplified <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B101">101</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. This method relies on the existence of 'SSR hot spots' in genomes <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B98">98</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B101">101</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. It has been used in the authentication of <it>Dendrobium officinale </it>(<it>Tiepi Shihu</it>) <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B102">102</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and in the studies of genetic variations and relationships <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B103">103</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B104">104</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B105">105</abbr>
									<abbr bid="B106">106</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>.</p>
							<fig id="F3">
								<title>
									<p>Figure 3</p>
								</title>
								<caption>
									<p>SSR and ISSR</p>
								</caption>
								<text>
									<p><b>SSR and ISSR</b>. SSR employs primers targeting a single repeat region, while ISSR employs a single primer containing repeats to amplify regions between two repeats.</p>
								</text>
								<graphic file="1749-8546-2-9-3"/>
							</fig>
							<p>As simple sequence repeats exist in any genome, this method allows fingerprints to be generated for any organism. However, the primers may anneal to sequences other than microsatellites of the desired repeats as in RAPD <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B99">99</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Moreover, the banding patterns can be affected by magnesium ion concentration, thermocycler and annealing temperature in use <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B102">102</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Compared to SSR markers, ISSR markers are not locus-specific and anonymous bands are produced in the fingerprints <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B101">101</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>.</p>
						</sec>
						<sec>
							<st>
								<p>Directed amplification of minisatellite-region DNA (DAMD)</p>
							</st>
							<p>Minisatellites are also known as variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR). They are similar to microsatellites except that the repeat unit sequence is longer than 10 bp (the distinction between microsatellites and minisatellites is often arbitrary with repeat units between 8 and 15 bp <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B107">107</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>). DAMD <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B108">108</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> is a DNA fingerprinting method based on amplification of the regions rich in minisatellites at relatively high stringencies by using previously found VNTR core sequences as primers (Figure <figr fid="F1">1</figr>). It is employed in identification of species-specific sequences <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B109">109</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. The method has been used for authentication of <it>Panax ginseng </it>(<it>Renshen</it>) and <it>Panax quinquefolius </it>(<it>Xiyangshen</it>) <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B42">42</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and characterization of varieties <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B78">78</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and cell lines <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B110">110</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>.</p>
							<p>Similar to SSR, minisatellites are present in all organisms, making it possible to apply this method to any genome. Examples include plants such as mulberry <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B78">78</abbr>
								</abbrgrp> and oilseed <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B109">109</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, mushrooms <it>Agaricus bisporus </it>and <it>Pleurotus </it><abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B111">111</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, animals such as human, snake and mouse <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B110">110</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>, insects such as mosquito and moth. This method is more reproducible than RAPD due to the longer primers used <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B111">111</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. However, similar to ISSR, it only reveals polymorphisms in the regions rich in repetitive sequences, while RP-PCR can represent the polymorphisms of the whole genome <abbrgrp>
									<abbr bid="B78">78</abbr>
								</abbrgrp>. Moreover, polymorphic sequence must be obtained by cloning polymorphic bands prior to sequencing because of the same primer sequences at both ends of the PCR product.</p>
						</sec>
					</sec>
					<sec>
						<st>
							<p>Sequence characterized amplified regions (SCAR)</p>
						</st>
						<p>SCAR <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B72">72</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> can be used for detection or differentiation of samples by using specific primers designed from polymorphic RAPD <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B72">72</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B112">112</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> or ISSR <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B113">113</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B114">114</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> fragments for PCR, leading to positive or negative amplification in target-containing and non-target-containing samples respectively <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B112">112</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B115">115</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> or amplification products of different sizes in the case of closely related samples <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B91">91</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B116">116</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. This method has been used for authentication of <it>Panax </it><abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B91">91</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> and crocodilian species <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B115">115</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>, and for discrimination of <it>Artemisia princeps </it>(<it>Kuihao</it>) and <it>Artemisia argyi </it>(<it>Aiye</it>) from other <it>Artemisia </it>herbs <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B112">112</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>.</p>
						<p>SCAR markers are more reproducible than RAPD markers, and they are straightforward for data interpretation. As little DNA is required for PCR, DNA extraction must be performed on a sample representative of the mix in order to accurately detect a target in a mixture. Prior sequence information (i.e. sequencing the polymorphic fragments) is required for designing the primers flanking the polymorphic region. As PCR inhibitory effects of ingredients in Chinese medicine can lead to false negative results, amplification of a control fragment using the same DNA template <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B114">114</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B115">115</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> or spiking control DNA amplifiable by the same primers to the sample DNA should be performed to ensure that the quality of sample DNA is suitable for PCR.</p>
					</sec>
					<sec>
						<st>
							<p>Amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS)</p>
						</st>
						<p>ARMS <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B117">117</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> is also known as allele-specific PCR (AS-PCR) <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B118">118</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. It refers to PCR amplification using primers which differ in the 3' terminal for distinguishing related samples. This method is based on the fact that mismatches at the last base(s) at the 3' terminal of primers can lead to failure in PCR <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B119">119</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B120">120</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. It has been used to identify <it>Panax </it>species <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B121">121</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> and <it>Curcuma </it>(<it>Ezhu</it>) species <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B122">122</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> using primers based on chloroplast <it>trn</it>K and nuclear 18S rRNA genes. ARMS based on mitochondrial <it>cytochrome b </it>gene has been used for detection of tiger bone DNA <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B123">123</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. It has also been used for distinguishing <it>Myospalax baileyi </it><abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B124">124</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> and gecko <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B125">125</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> from their substitutes and adulterants.</p>
						<p>This method is simple, rapid and reliable <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B117">117</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. However, as the absence of bands is also considered as a positive result for detection experiments, appropriate positive controls should be included to show that the reagents have indeed worked properly and that the PCR process was not problematic. PCR inhibitory effects leading to false negative results can be identified by parallel testing of samples spiked with tiny quantities of pure target DNA to demonstrate the level of detection <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B123">123</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>.</p>
					</sec>
					<sec>
						<st>
							<p>Simple sequence repeats (SSR) analysis</p>
						</st>
						<p>SSR analysis is also referred to as simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP). SSR <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B126">126</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B127">127</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> is also known as microsatellites, short tandem repeats and sequence-tagged microsatellite sites (STMS) which are short tandem repeats of 2&#8211;8 nucleotides <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B128">128</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B129">129</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> or 1&#8211;6 nucleotides <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B130">130</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B131">131</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B132">132</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> widely and abundantly dispersed in most nuclear eukaryotic genomes <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B130">130</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B133">133</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B134">134</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. Changes in repeat numbers at SSR loci are much more frequent than normal mutation rate <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B101">101</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B135">135</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B136">136</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> because of slippage <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B133">133</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B136">136</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B137">137</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B138">138</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> and recombination <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B133">133</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B138">138</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B139">139</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B140">140</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. The different numbers of repeating units (alleles) in polymorphic loci lead to variation in band sizes (length polymorphism) when specific flanking primers designed based on conserved sequences are used for amplification of the loci in organisms of the same species. The presence or absence of each allele at each locus can be scored digitally. Figure <figr fid="F3">3</figr> shows the procedural differences between ISSR and SSR.</p>
						<p>SSR analysis has been applied in authentication of ginseng <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B141">141</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. In SSR analysis, <it>Panax quinquefolius </it>(<it>Xiyangshen</it>) showed different allele patterns compared with those of <it>Panax ginseng </it>(<it>Renshen</it>). Moreover, cultivated and wild <it>Panax quinquefolius </it>(<it>Xiyangshen</it>) can be distinguished from each other <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B141">141</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. This method has also been used in characterization of germplasm resource of <it>Gastrodia elata </it>(<it>Tianma</it>) <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B142">142</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> and studying genomic variation in regenerants of <it>Codonopsis lanceolata </it>(<it>Dangshen</it>) <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B104">104</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. Due to its ability for analysis at low taxonomic levels, it has been applied to breeding programs <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B143">143</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>.</p>
						<p>SSR loci are highly polymorphic <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B101">101</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B144">144</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. In bread wheat, loci with 4 to 40 alleles have been found for 480 varieties <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B145">145</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>, with an average of 16.4 alleles. It is possible to multiplex 17 loci in a single PCR reaction <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B146">146</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. As the primers are designed according to conserved sequences, they may be successfully applied for related species <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B147">147</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B148">148</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> and sometimes across genera <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B147">147</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B149">149</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. Moreover, the primers can be accessible to other laboratories via published primer sequences <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B150">150</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B151">151</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B152">152</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. Besides the advantages of employing PCR and the high reproducibility, this technique can be fully automated (including automated sizing of PCR products by fluorescence-based detection) and fitted into large-scale, high throughput authentication centers <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>.</p>
						<p>Size differences can also be caused by insertions and deletions, and duplication events in the flanking sequences <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B153">153</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B154">154</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B155">155</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. However, high initial investment and technical expertise are required for development of SSR markers <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B156">156</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B157">157</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B158">158</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. Although SSR markers can be identified by screening DNA <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B150">150</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B159">159</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B160">160</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> or EST sequence databases <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B161">161</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B162">162</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B163">163</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>, sequence information is not available for most Chinese medicinal species. Without sequence information, SSR marker development involves either constructing enriched genomic libraries <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B142">142</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B147">147</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B149">149</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B164">164</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>, ISSR genomic pools <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B165">165</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B166">166</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> or Southern hybridization-screened RAPD genomic pools <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B167">167</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B168">168</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> followed by cloning and sequencing. However, the identified loci may not be polymorphic or informative <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B169">169</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>. Moreover, null alleles (i.e. loss of PCR products occurring due to mutations in the primer binding sites) may be encountered <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B143">143</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B150">150</abbr>
								<abbr bid="B158">158</abbr>
							</abbrgrp> even when using SSR markers developed from the same species <abbrgrp>
								<abbr bid="B170">170</abbr>
							</abbrgrp>.</p>
					</sec>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Sequencing-based methods</p>
					</st>
					<p>Much information can be obtained from DNA sequences <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. DNA sequences can be used for studying phylogenetic relationships among different species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B70">70</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B171">171</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B172">172</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. Sequencing also allows detection of new or unusual species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B173">173</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. Another advantage of using sequencing for species identification is that the identities of adulterants can be identified by performing sequence searches on public sequence databases such as GenBank. By database searching, Mihalov <it>et al</it>. <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B174">174</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> successfully identified soybean substituted for ginseng (<it>Panax </it>species) in commercial samples. However, prior sequence knowledge is required for designing primers for amplification of the region of interest <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>.</p>
					<p>DNA sequencing can be used to assess variations due to transversions, transitions, insertions or deletions. Different regions in the genome evolve at different rates, which are useful for identification at different taxonomic levels <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. Regions that do not code for proteins are under lower selective pressure and thus can be more variable. The more variable is a particular region, the more closely related individuals can be differentiated by this region. Regions commonly used include rRNA genes, mitochondrial genes and chloroplast genes <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B175">175</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. There are more than 100 copies of these genes in a cell, which evolve inter-dependently (i.e. concerted evolution <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B176">176</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B177">177</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B178">178</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, previously known as horizontal evolution <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B179">179</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> in the case of rRNA genes, and homoplasmy <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B180">180</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B181">181</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> in the cases of mitochondrial and chloroplast genes). Thus, methods using these regions are highly sensitive and amplifications are facilitated. This is also advantageous during PCR amplification of medicinal samples with degraded DNA because the presence of one full-length copy in a reaction is theoretically enough for amplification. Moreover, the conserved sequences flanking the genes are useful for designing 'universal' primers to be used for amplifying and sequencing the genes from many species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B182">182</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B183">183</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B184">184</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B185">185</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>.</p>
					<p>rDNA sequences have been used for studying Chinese medicines such as <it>Panax </it>species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B35">35</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B186">186</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B187">187</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B188">188</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, <it>Eucommia ulmoides </it>(<it>Duzhong</it>) <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B189">189</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, <it>Cordyceps </it>(<it>Dongchongxiacao</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B190">190</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, <it>Dendrobium </it>(<it>Shihu</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B191">191</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, <it>Myospalax baileyi </it><abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B192">192</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and <it>Ligusticum chuanxiong </it>(<it>Chuanxiong</it>) <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B193">193</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. The chloroplast sequences have been used for studying <it>Curcuma </it>(<it>Ezhu</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B194">194</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, <it>Panax notoginseng </it>(<it>Sanqi</it>) <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B67">67</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B188">188</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, <it>Adenophora </it>(<it>Shashen</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B195">195</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and <it>Atractylodes </it>(<it>Cangzhu</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B38">38</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. The mitochondrial sequences have been used for studying <it>Bungarus parvus </it><abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B196">196</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, <it>Hippocampus </it>species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B197">197</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and turtle shells <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B198">198</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Hybridization-based methods</p>
					</st>
					<p>Nucleic acid hybridization is a process in which two complementary single-stranded nucleic acids anneal into a double-stranded nucleic acid through the formation of hydrogen bonds. DNA hybridization has been used for detection of <it>Dendrobium </it>(<it>Shihu</it>) species by incorporating a species-specific region of reference samples on a glass slide and subsequent hybridization of the region amplified from a complex mixture of medicinal materials using universal primers <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B199">199</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. Besides <it>Dendrobium </it>(<it>Shihu</it>) <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B200">200</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, it has also been used to identify <it>Fritillaria </it>(<it>Chuanbeimu</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B201">201</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and toxic Chinese medicinal materials such as <it>Datura </it>(<it>Yangjinhua</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B202">202</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B203">203</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, <it>Pinellia </it>(<it>Banxia</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B33">33</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B202">202</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and others<abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B202">202</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B204">204</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>.</p>
					<p>With DNA hybridization, detection from a variety of possible species is feasible <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B204">204</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. Detection of the presence of multiple species in admixtures <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B205">205</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B206">206</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and in a wide range of commercially processed, heated and canned food products have also been demonstrated <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B206">206</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B207">207</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B208">208</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. Moreover, DNA hybridization has been used to identify organisms of different breeds <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B209">209</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. If the probes are oligonucleotides shorter than 100 bases, hybridization is possible even after a considerable level of DNA degradation <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. However, a relatively large amount of DNA is required and the process is time-consuming (because the hybridization step typically requires overnight incubation) <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B34">34</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and labor-intensive compared to PCR-based methods. If the experimental conditions are not stringent enough, cross-hybridization with highly similar but not identical targets may also occur <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B204">204</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B210">210</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B211">211</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, resulting in false-positive results. Furthermore, only a limited number of probes can be applied in one hybridization experiment <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B212">212</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B213">213</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> for most hybridization methods. As a result, much time has to be spent on testing a large number of probes and checking for false-positives and false-negatives. Despite the fact that microarray hybridization has a high throughput, it is still quite expensive.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Comparison of methods</p>
				</st>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Level of identification</p>
					</st>
					<p>The level of identification by a certain method largely depends on its targeted region in the genome and its mechanism and principle of analysis. Species-specific regions, such as internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and 5S rRNA spacer regions of ribosomal DNA, mitochondrial <it>cytochrome b </it>and chloroplast <it>trn</it>L-<it>trn</it>F spacer regions, have been used for species-level identification by sequencing <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B70">70</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B174">174</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, microarray hybridization <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B199">199</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B204">204</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and PCR <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B123">123</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. SCAR, in which the species-specific bands generated from fingerprints are used for primer construction <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B91">91</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B112">112</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, is applicable to species-level identification. However, techniques based on differences of several bases, such as ARMS and PCR-RFLP, can be applied to species-level identification or lower even when more conserved genes are employed, as long as sufficient polymorphic nucleotides can be found in the genes. For example, 18S ribosomal gene has been used for PCR-RFLP for differentiation of <it>Panax ginseng </it>(<it>Renshen</it>) from 4 localities <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. The chloroplast <it>trn</it>K gene and the nuclear 18S rRNA gene have been used for ARMS to identify <it>Panax </it>species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B121">121</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and <it>Curcuma </it>(<it>Ezhu</it>) species <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B122">122</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>.</p>
					<p>Except for PCR-RFLP, fingerprinting methods can only be used to discriminate among closely related individuals, mostly on population <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B214">214</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B215">215</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, strain and locality <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B36">36</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B53">53</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B59">59</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B62">62</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> levels. However, if scoring of bands for further processing is not required, fingerprinting methods can be applied in differentiation at the species level <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B51">51</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B60">60</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> by banding pattern comparison with reference materials.</p>
					<p>SSR analysis can be used in identification of species within the same genus <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B25">25</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B141">141</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>, at the variety and cultivar level <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B143">143</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B145">145</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B216">216</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> as well as at the individual level <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B217">217</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B218">218</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. It is not used for comparing species of different genus because the sequences of the amplification products can be quite different even if the primers can successfully amplify PCR products <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B153">153</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B219">219</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>. ISSR involves amplification of regions between SSR loci and can be used for authentication at population <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B102">102</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B220">220</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B221">221</abbr>
						</abbrgrp> and species levels <abbrgrp>
							<abbr bid="B222">222</abbr>
							<abbr bid="B223">223</abbr>
						</abbrgrp>.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<st>
						<p>Choice of method</p>
					</st>
					<p>Table <tblr tid="T1">1</tblr> summarizes the methods mentioned in this article. Each method has its own advantages and limitations. Decisions as to which method to use should be based on the aim, the DNA quality of the obtained sample and the cost of implementation (e.g. whether prior sequence knowledge is obtainable and required). A diagram showing the technical considerations affecting the choice of method is provided in Figure <figr fid="F4">4</figr>. Besides method selection, choosing a suitable DNA region for analysis is also crucial in obtaining good results (Figure <figr fid="F5">5</figr>). It should be noted that the exact taxonomic levels the regions can be applied to depend on the choice of method, and that successful application on a species does not guarantee successful application on other species at the same taxonomic level.</p>
					<tbl id="T1">
						<title>
							<p>Table 1</p>
						</title>
						<caption>
							<p>Comparison of various DNA methods (adapted from [135, 237, 245, 247])</p>
						</caption>
						<tblbdy cols="10">
							<r>
								<c>
									<p/>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>SCAR</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>ARMS</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>SSR</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>PCR-RFLP</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>RP-PCR</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>ISSR</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>AFLP</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>Sequencing</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p><b>Hybridization</b></p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c cspan="10">
									<hr/>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Development cost</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium <sup>a</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Running cost</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium <sup>a</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Polymorphism</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low <sup>b</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low <sup>c</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high <sup>d</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low <sup>e</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium <sup>f</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium <sup>f</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium <sup>f</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium-low <sup>g</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>only for detection <sup>h</sup></p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Detection of contamination by DNA of the same target species (mixture)</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>i</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>k</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>k</sup></p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Detection of contamination by non-target species DNA (mixture)</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes <sup>j</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>k</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>k</sup></p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Detection of contamination by DNA of the same target species (mixture)</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no <sup>i</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>k</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>k</sup></p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Detection of contamination by non-target species DNA (mixture)</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>No</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes<sup>j</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>No</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>k</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes/no<sup>k</sup></p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Multi-locus/single locus</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>single locus</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>single locus</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>single locus</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>single locus</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>multi-loci</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>multi-loci</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>multi-loci</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>single locus</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>single locus</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Level of identification (taxonomic level)</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>species</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>species to strain</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>strain</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>species to strain</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>species to strain</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>species to strain</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>species to strain</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>family to strain</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>genus to subspecies</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Quality of DNA required (integrity)</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Quality of DNA required (purity)</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high <sup>l</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high <sup>l</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high <sup>l</sup></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Prior sequence knowledge requirement (including universal primer sequence)</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>no</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Throughput</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Level of skills required</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low-medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Automation</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>difficult</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>yes</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>difficult</p>
								</c>
							</r>
							<r>
								<c ca="left">
									<p><b>Reliability</b></p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>low</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>high</p>
								</c>
								<c ca="center">
									<p>medium</p>
								</c>
							</r>
						</tblbdy>
						<tblfn>
							<p><b>Development cost</b>: cost for developing standardized reference results for target samples</p>
							<p><b>Running cost</b>: cost for routine testing</p>
							<p><b>Detection of contamination</b>: same target species = samples of the same strain or locality; non-target species = adulterants or substitutes</p>
							<p><b>Multi-locus</b>: simultaneous amplification of multiple regions in the genome in a single PCR</p>
							<p><b>Prior sequence requirement</b>: sequence requirement to design primers for amplification or probes for hybridization</p>
							<p><b>Throughput</b>: number of samples that can be handled within a given period of time</p>
							<p><b>Reliability</b>: giving reproducible and accurate results under the same conditions</p>
							<p>a: enzyme dependent</p>
							<p>b: band/no band, or size polymorphism</p>
							<p>c: band or no band</p>
							<p>d: null allele or size polymorphism</p>
							<p>e: band number and size polymorphism</p>
							<p>f: presence/absence of all the bands in a pattern</p>
							<p>g: sequence dependent; nucleotide difference</p>
							<p>h: presence or absence of sample DNA</p>
							<p>i: restriction enzyme dependent</p>
							<p>j: primer dependent</p>
							<p>k: sequence dependent</p>
							<p>l: crude tolerated</p>
						</tblfn>
					</tbl>
					<fig id="F4">
						<title>
							<p>Figure 4</p>
						</title>
						<caption>
							<p>Selection of appropriate molecular identification methods for (a) species and (b) locality/strain levels</p>
						</caption>
						<text>
							<p><b>Selection of appropriate molecular identification methods for (a) species and (b) locality/strain levels</b>. a) For species level, SCAR and ARMS are suitable for detection of a target species or differentiation of species within the same genus. Microarray hybridization is suitable for detection of species within a list of suspected ones. Sequencing of species-specific regions is suitable for identification of samples with its species totally unknown. b) For locality or strain level, species identification should be performed first. Then, depending on whether prior sequence knowledge is available and the integrity of the DNA samples, different methods can be applied. SSR analysis and sequencing of strain-specific sequences are suitable for samples with primer sequences already available and SSR analysis is especially suitable for samples with DNA of low integrity. For samples without prior sequence knowledge, SSR marker development followed by subsequent SSR analysis can be applied for DNA samples of low integrity, while AFLP, RP-PCR, ISSR, DALP and DAMD can be applied for DNA samples of high integrity.</p>
						</text>
						<graphic file="1749-8546-2-9-4"/>
					</fig>
					<fig id="F5">
						<title>
							<p>Figure 5</p>
						</title>
						<caption>
							<p>Comparison of various regions for use on various taxonomic levels (adapted from [244-246])</p>
						</caption>
						<text>
							<p><b>Comparison of various regions for use on various taxonomic levels (adapted from [244-246])</b>. The thickness of the lines represents how frequently the regions are used for identification at the levels. The exact taxonomic levels that the regions can be applied to depend on the selected method. Successful application on a species does not guarantee successful application on other species at the same taxonomic level. For nuclear DNA regions, 18S and 5.8S regions are usually used for identification to the order or family levels and 26S is usually used for the order level down to the species level. The two ITS regions and the 5S spacer region are commonly used for identification at the species level, but they can also be applied down to the population/strain/variety level. For chloroplast DNA regions, 16S is suitable for the order level, while <it>rbcL</it>, <it>atp&#946; </it>and <it>ndhF </it>are suitable for the levels from order to species. The <it>trnL </it>intron, <it>trnL</it>-<it>trnF </it>spacer and <it>matK </it>regions can be applied to the levels from order to population/strain/variety, but the former two are more commonly used for the levels from family to species, while the latter is commonly used for the levels from order to subspecies. The <it>atp&#946;</it>-<it>rbcL </it>region can be used for the levels from genus to population/strain/variety, but it is more commonly used for the levels from genus to subspecies. For mitochondrial regions, <it>cytochrome b </it>and the control region can be used for identification at the levels from species to population/strain/variety, but the former is more commonly used for the species level and the latter is more commonly used for the subspecies level and lower.</p>
						</text>
						<graphic file="1749-8546-2-9-5"/>
					</fig>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Problems faced for using DNA in identification</p>
				</st>
				<p>While DNA methods are excellent for identifying Chinese medicinal materials of various forms, certain problems remain to be solved. DNA degradation is common for those materials that have been heat-treated <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B123">123</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B224">224</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B225">225</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B226">226</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> by frying, sun-drying, oven-drying or milling without cooling, treated with various chemicals and stored for a long time in various conditions. This problem may be overcome by choosing more degradation-tolerant methods, one of which is employing multi-copy genes (e.g. ribosomal and mitochondrial genes) <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B227">227</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> so that the chances of getting some full-length copies are higher. The mitochondrial genes are also suitable because mitochondria are relatively intact during processing <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B228">228</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Another approach is to analyze small regions of DNA by methods such as SSR analysis <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B229">229</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B230">230</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>, which may target sequences as short as several tens of base pairs of DNA and the chances of breakage within the target region are minimal <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B231">231</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B232">232</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B233">233</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Hybridization is also useful in identification of degraded DNA <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B206">206</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B207">207</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p>
				<p>The presence of PCR inhibitors is a problem. Chinese medicinal materials are usually (1) plants that may contain phenolic compounds, acidic polysaccharides and pigments, (2) fungi which may contain acidic polysaccharides and pigments, or (3) animal remains which may contain fat and complex polysaccharides. Choosing the most suitable DNA extraction procedures for the types of samples may help eliminate the PCR inhibitors <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B234">234</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B235">235</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B236">236</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B237">237</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. Other possible solutions are diluting the extracted DNA and adding PCR enhancers.</p>
				<p>Contamination by non-target DNA of bacteria, fungi or insects due to improper storage or by other medicinal materials in formulations is another challenge. This creates the biggest problem for fingerprinting methods because the DNA of the contaminants will be amplified. This may be overcome by using methods specific for the target such as ARMS and SCAR. If the region of analysis is species-specific and the stringency is high enough, microarray analysis is also an alternative for studying DNA mixtures <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B199">199</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B238">238</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. However, DNA degradation by microbes cannot be avoided in contaminated samples <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B239">239</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>.</p>
				<p>DNA information is not directly correlated with the amounts of active ingredients. However, genetic data have its own advantages (as discussed above) over other methods for authentication and identification.</p>
				<p>There are successful cases of using DNA methods to identify Chinese medicines, such as <it>Panax </it><abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B174">174</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B186">186</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B240">240</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> (Table <tblr tid="T2">2</tblr>), crocodilian species <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B115">115</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> and <it>Dendrobium </it>(<it>Shihu</it>) species <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B200">200</abbr>
						<abbr bid="B241">241</abbr>
					</abbrgrp> in commercial products. DNA methods can also be used to identify components in concentrated Chinese medicine preparations in which the components have been grounded, boiled, filtrated, concentrated, dried and blended <abbrgrp>
						<abbr bid="B242">242</abbr>
					</abbrgrp>. By applying appropriate methods and regions of genome, problems in authentication of Chinese medicinal materials can be solved.</p>
				<tbl id="T2">
					<title>
						<p>Table 2</p>
					</title>
					<caption>
						<p>DNA methods for identification of <it>Panax </it>species</p>
					</caption>
					<tblbdy cols="6">
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p><b>Techniques</b></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p><b>Samples to differentiate</b></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p><b>Prerequisite</b></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p><b>Summary of results</b></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p><b>Year of publication</b></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p><b>Ref</b></p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c cspan="6">
								<hr/>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>PCR-RFLP</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Six <it>Panax </it>species and adulterants</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequences</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>The polymorphisms in the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 sequence among the samples can be shown using various restriction enzymes to create species-specific RFLP profiles. Ten per cent of contamination of <it>P. ginseng </it>was detected from <it>P. quinquefolius </it>sample.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1999</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>14</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>PCR-RFLP</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Three <it>Panax </it>species</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>18S sequences</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Based on the 18S rRNA gene, three <it>Panax </it>species gave species-specific electrophoretic profiles by PCR-RFLP and expected fragments corresponding to each species were detected only under defined conditions by mutant allele specific amplification (MASA, i.e. ARMS) analyses.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1997</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>35</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>PCR-RFLP</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>P. ginseng </it>from four localities, one from China and three from Korea</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>18S sequences</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>A ginseng sample showed fragments distinctive from the other two samples of the same country but different locality origins.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2001</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>36</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>AFLP</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>P. ginseng </it>and <it>P. quinquefolius</it></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>no</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Polymorphic bands unique to <it>P. ginseng </it>and to <it>P. quinquefolius </it>and bands common to them were identified. <it>P. ginseng </it>samples from different farms in China and Korea are homogeneous genetically. <it>P. quinquefolius </it>from different sources are much more heterogeneous.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2002</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>42</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>RAPD</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>P. ginseng </it>from four localities, one from China and three from Korea</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>no</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Similarity among the DNA of ginseng plants analyzed was low.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2001</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>36</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>RAPD</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Three strains of <it>P. ginseng</it></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>no</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>A 725 bp band was present in the elite strain Aizu K-111 (now called <it>Kaishusan</it>) while the other strains did not always show this band.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2001</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>62</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>RAPD</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Two cultivated groups of ginseng</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>no</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Cluster analysis of the patterns showed that the genetic relationship between different strains of Da-maya group is closer than those strains of E-maya group.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2004</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>64</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>RAPD and AP-PCR</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Three <it>Panax </it>species and adulterants</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>no</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Fingerprints for <it>P. ginseng </it>or <it>P. quinquefolius </it>were basically consistent irrespective of plant source or age compared to the very different fingerprints from adulterants. The degree of similarity of the fingerprints confirmed that <it>P. ginseng </it>is more closely related to <it>P. quinquefolius </it>than it is to <it>P. notoginseng</it>.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1995</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>52</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>AP-PCR</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Oriental ginseng from two sources and two American ginseng</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>no</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Oriental ginseng from two sources produced nearly identical fingerprints. Two American ginseng samples gave fingerprints distinctive to the species with two primers tested but polymorphic and significantly different fingerprints with one of the primers tested. Therefore, the American ginseng samples were supposed to be from different strains.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1994</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>60</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>DALP</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>P. ginseng </it>and <it>P. quinquefolius</it></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>no</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>A DALP fragment was found present in all <it>P. ginsengs </it>but absent in all the <it>P. quinquefolius </it>examined. The species-specific band was converted to sequence-tagged site (i.e. amplification by specific primers giving a species-specific band) for quick authentication.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2001</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>95</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>DAMD</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>P. ginseng </it>and <it>P. quinquefolius</it></p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>polymorphic AFLP band</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>A polymorphic AFLP band in <it>P. ginseng </it>contains a minisatellite which can be used in DAMD analysis to authenticate the two tested ginsengs.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2002</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>42</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>SCAR</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Two <it>Panax </it>species and adulterants</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>polymorphic RAPD fragment</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>There is a 25 bp insertion in <it>P. ginseng </it>for a polymorphic RAPD fragment. By using primers designed based on this polymorphic fragment, <it>P. quinquefolius </it>and <it>P. ginseng </it>can be differentiated. Amplification on four other <it>Panax </it>species and two ginseng adulterants gave markedly different products.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2001</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>91</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>ARMS</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Five <it>Panax </it>species and corresponding Ginseng drugs</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>trnK </it>and nuclear 18S gene sequences</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Five sets of species-specific primers with two pairs in each set were designed. Two expected fragments, one from <it>trnK </it>gene and another from 18S rRNA gene, were observed simultaneously only when the set of species-specific primers encountered template DNA of the corresponding species.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2004</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>121</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>SSR</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Two <it>Panax </it>species</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>primer sequences for the loci</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Using nine of the 16 screened loci, Chinese ginseng was differentiated unambiguously from the American samples. Some of the informative loci showed different allelic patterns among ginsengs from different farms.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2003</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>25</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>SSR</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>American ginseng and Oriental ginseng, cultivated and wild American ginseng</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>primer sequences for the loci</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>American ginseng had a different allele pattern (allele frequency in an American ginseng population of 34 cultivated and 21 wild ginseng) in two microsatellite loci compared with that of the Oriental ginseng (six from China and South Korea). Cultivated and wild American ginseng were distinguished.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2005</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>141</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Sequencing</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Three <it>Panax </it>species</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>primer sequences for 18S region</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>The sequences of the 18S rRNA region of 3 <it>Panax </it>species have different base substitutions at four nucleotide positions. By the polymorphism, the ginseng species from commercial samples were identified.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1996</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>186</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Sequencing</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Twelve <it>Panax </it>species</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>primer sequences for ITS and 5.8S regions</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>The sequences of the ITS and 5.8S coding region were used to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationships among twelve <it>Panax </it>species. <it>P. quinquefolius </it>was suggested to be more closely related to the eastern Asian species than <it>P. trifolius</it>. Previous suggestions about monophyly of <it>P. ginseng, P. notoginseng </it>and <it>P. quinquefolius </it>were not supported by the ITS data. Several biogeographical implications were inferred from the results.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>1996</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>187</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Sequencing</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>Panax notoginseng </it>of different cultivar origins</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>primer sequences for 18S and matK genes</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>The nuclear 18S rRNA and chloroplast <it>matK </it>genes of 18 samples of <it>Panax notoginseng </it>and its processed material <it>Sanqi </it>(<it>Radix Notoginseng</it>) were found to be identical regardless of cultivar origin. Thus the same strain should be used in cultivation for conservation of the species.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2006</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>188</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Sequencing</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>P. notoginseng </it>and adulterants</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>primer sequences for 18S and matK genes</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p><it>Notoginseng </it>and its adulterants were differentiated on the basis of their sequence variation in the nuclear ribosomal RNA small subunit (18S rRNA) and chloroplast <it>matK </it>gene.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2001</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>67</p>
							</c>
						</r>
						<r>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>Sequencing</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>Two <it>Panax </it>species and adulterants</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>primer sequences for ITS and <it>rbcL </it>genes</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="left">
								<p>The nuclear ITS and chloroplast <it>rbcL </it>regions were amplified using universal primers and then sequenced using nested ginseng-specific primers. All the samples including five root samples, thirteen powder samples and six capsule samples were identified as American or Korean ginseng except a capsule and a tablet that were identified as soybean, by using the universal primers for sequencing. They could not be sequenced by the nested primers.</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>2000</p>
							</c>
							<c ca="center">
								<p>174</p>
							</c>
						</r>
					</tblbdy>
					<tblfn>
						<p>The results obtained from <it>Panax </it>do not represent Chinese medicines. The results of specific techniques depend on their conditions (e.g. primers and magnesium concentration).</p>
					</tblfn>
				</tbl>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Conclusion</p>
			</st>
			<p>Authentication of Chinese medicinal materials is important for ensuring safe and appropriate use of Chinese medicines, ensuring the therapeutic effectiveness, minimizing unfair trade and raising consumers' confidence towards Chinese medicines. It also plays an important role in the modernization, industrialization and internationalization of Chinese medicine. DNA methods are reliable approaches towards authentication of Chinese medicinal materials. While their abilities in identification at various levels (e.g. species, strain and locality levels) may vary, they are used in identification of samples in any physical forms and provide consistent results irrespective of age, tissue origin, physiological conditions, environmental factors, harvest, storage and processing methods of the samples. The low requirement of sample quantity for analysis is of particular importance for quality control of premium medicinal materials and for detecting contaminants. For future development, it is necessary to compile a reference library of Chinese medicines with genetic information, especially for endangered species and those with high market value and/or with possible poisonous adulterants <abbrgrp>
					<abbr bid="B243">243</abbr>
				</abbrgrp>.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Abbreviations</p>
			</st>
			<p>5S spacer 5S rRNA gene spacer</p>
			<p>18S gene a gene encoding for the small ribosomal subunit</p>
			<p>26S gene a gene encoding for the large ribosomal subunit</p>
			<p>AFLP amplified fragment length polymorphism</p>
			<p>AP-PCR arbitrarily primed PCR</p>
			<p>ARMS amplification refractory mutation system</p>
			<p>AS-PCR allele-specific PCR</p>
			<p>atp&#946; gene encoding the &#946;-subunit of ATP synthase</p>
			<p>atp&#946;-<it>rbcL </it>intergenic spacer the spacer region between the <it>atp&#946; </it>and <it>rbcL </it>genes</p>
			<p>BSA bovine serum albumin</p>
			<p><it>cyt b cytochrome b </it>gene</p>
			<p>DAF DNA amplification fingerprinting</p>
			<p>DALP direct amplification of length polymorphism</p>
			<p>DAMD directed amplification of minisatellite-region DNA</p>
			<p>ISSR inter-simple sequence repeat</p>
			<p>ITS internal transcribed spacer</p>
			<p><it>matK </it>gene encoding a putative maturase for splicing the precursor of <it>trnK</it></p>
			<p><it>ndhF </it>gene encoding the ND5 protein of chloroplast NADH dehydrogenase</p>
			<p>PCR polymerase chain reaction</p>
			<p>PCR-RFLP PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism</p>
			<p>RAPD random amplified polymorphic DNA</p>
			<p><it>rbcL </it>gene encoding large subunit of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase</p>
			<p>rDNA ribosomal DNA</p>
			<p>RP-PCR random-primed PCR</p>
			<p>rRNA genes ribosomal RNA genes</p>
			<p>SCAR sequence characterized amplified regions</p>
			<p>SSLP simple sequence length polymorphism</p>
			<p>SSR simple sequence repeat</p>
			<p>STMS sequence-tagged microsatellite sites</p>
			<p><it>trnK </it>chloroplast transfer RNA (tRNA) gene for lysine</p>
			<p><it>trnL </it>&#8211; <it>trnF </it>spacer non-coding intergenic spacer between <it>trnL </it>and <it>trnF </it>in the chloroplast genome</p>
			<p><it>trnL </it>intron intron region between the two exons of tRNA gene for leucine</p>
			<p>VNTR variable number of tandem repeat</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Competing interests</p>
			</st>
			<p>The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<st>
				<p>Authors' contributions</p>
			</st>
			<p>PYY drafted the manuscript. CFC, CYM and HSK helped draft and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p>
		</sec>
	</bdy>
   <bm>
		<ack>
			<sec>
				<st>
					<p>Acknowledgements</p>
				</st>
				<p>The <it>Astragalus </it>samples were supplied by The School of Chinese Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.</p>
			</sec>
		</ack>
		<refgrp>
			<bibl id="B1">
				<title>
					<p>Complementary and alternative therapies in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a systematic review</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Coon</snm>
						<fnm>JT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ernst</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Hepatol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>40</volume>
				<fpage>491</fpage>
				<lpage>500</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jhep.2003.11.014</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15123365</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B2">
				<title>
					<p>Stroke therapy in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM): prospects for drug discovery and development</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Gong</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Sucher</snm>
						<fnm>NJ</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Phytomedicine</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>9</volume>
				<fpage>478</fpage>
				<lpage>484</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1078/09447110260571760</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">12222672</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B3">
				<title>
					<p>Physicians' philosophy of care: a comparison of complementary and conventional medicine</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Marian</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Widmer</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Herren</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Donges</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Busato</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Forsch Komplementarmed</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>13</volume>
				<fpage>70</fpage>
				<lpage>77</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1159/000090735</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16645286</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B4">
				<title>
					<p>Global harmonization of herbal health claims</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Mahady</snm>
						<fnm>GB</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Nutr</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>131</volume>
				<fpage>1120S</fpage>
				<lpage>1123S</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11238830</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B5">
				<title>
					<p>Chinese proprietary medicine in Singapore: regulatory control of toxic heavy metals and undeclared drugs</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Koh</snm>
						<fnm>HL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Woo</snm>
						<fnm>SO</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Drug Saf</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>23</volume>
				<fpage>351</fpage>
				<lpage>362</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.2165/00002018-200023050-00001</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">11085343</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B6">
				<title>
					<p>Adulterants of herbal products can cause poisoning</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>But</snm>
						<fnm>PP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tomlinson</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cheung</snm>
						<fnm>KO</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yong</snm>
						<fnm>SP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Szeto</snm>
						<fnm>ML</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lee</snm>
						<fnm>CK</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>BMJ</source>
				<pubdate>1996</pubdate>
				<volume>313</volume>
				<fpage>117</fpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8688743</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B7">
				<title>
					<p>Acute <it>Erycibe henryi </it>Prain ("Ting Kung Teng") poisoning</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Huang</snm>
						<fnm>HH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yen</snm>
						<fnm>DHT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wu</snm>
						<fnm>ML</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Deng</snm>
						<fnm>JF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Huang</snm>
						<fnm>CI</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lee</snm>
						<fnm>CH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Clin Toxicol</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>44</volume>
				<fpage>71</fpage>
				<lpage>75</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1080/15563650500394902</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B8">
				<title>
					<p>Analysis of products suspected of containing <it>Aristolochia </it>or <it>Asarum </it>species</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Schaneberg</snm>
						<fnm>BT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Khan</snm>
						<fnm>IA</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Ethnopharmacol</source>
				<pubdate>2004</pubdate>
				<volume>94</volume>
				<fpage>245</fpage>
				<lpage>249</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jep.2004.06.010</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15325726</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B9">
				<title>
					<p>Non-technical causes of fakes existing in Chinese medicinal material markets</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Chen</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chen</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>An</snm>
						<fnm>Z</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shi</snm>
						<fnm>S</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhan</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongyaocai</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>516</fpage>
				<lpage>519</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">12599764</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B10">
				<title>
					<p>Differentiation of medicinal <it>Cordyceps </it>species by rDNA ITS sequence analysis</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Chen</snm>
						<fnm>YQ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhou</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Qu</snm>
						<fnm>LH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta Med</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>68</volume>
				<fpage>635</fpage>
				<lpage>639</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-2002-32892</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12142999</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B11">
				<title>
					<p>Authentic identification of stigma Croci (stigma of <it>Crocus sativus</it>) from its adulterants by molecular genetic analysis</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ma</snm>
						<fnm>XQ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhu</snm>
						<fnm>DY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>SP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dong</snm>
						<fnm>TT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tsim</snm>
						<fnm>KW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta Med</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>67</volume>
				<fpage>183</fpage>
				<lpage>186</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-2001-11533</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">11301875</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B12">
				<title>
					<p>Toxicity of the Chinese herb mu tong (<it>Aristolochia manshuriensis</it>). What history tells us</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhu</snm>
						<fnm>YP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Adverse Drug React Toxicol Rev</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>21</volume>
				<fpage>171</fpage>
				<lpage>177</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">12503251</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B13">
				<title>
					<p>Consideration on the problem of "ascension of the case poisoned by Chinese Traditional Medicines"</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Yuan</snm>
						<fnm>ST</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>25</volume>
				<fpage>579</fpage>
				<lpage>582</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">12516446</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B14">
				<title>
					<p>Molecular authentication of <it>Panax </it>species</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ngan</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shaw</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>But</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Phytochemistry</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>50</volume>
				<fpage>787</fpage>
				<lpage>791</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0031-9422(98)00606-2</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">10192964</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B15">
				<title>
					<p>Chemical assessment of roots of <it>Panax notoginseng </it>in China: regional and seasonal variations in its active constituents</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Dong</snm>
						<fnm>TT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cui</snm>
						<fnm>XM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Song</snm>
						<fnm>ZH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhao</snm>
						<fnm>KJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ji</snm>
						<fnm>ZN</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lo</snm>
						<fnm>CK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tsim</snm>
						<fnm>KW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Agric Food Chem</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>51</volume>
				<fpage>4617</fpage>
				<lpage>4623</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/jf034229k</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14705886</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B16">
				<title>
					<p>Random primed polymerase chain reaction differentiates <it>Codonopsis pilosula </it>from different localities</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>YB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ngan</snm>
						<fnm>FN</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>ZT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ng</snm>
						<fnm>TB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>But</snm>
						<fnm>PPH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shaw</snm>
						<fnm>PC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta Med</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>65</volume>
				<fpage>157</fpage>
				<lpage>160</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-1999-14058</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">17260247</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B17">
				<title>
					<p>Quality evaluation of traditional Chinese drug toad venom from different origins through a simultaneous determination of bufogenins and indole alkaloids by HPLC</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cui</snm>
						<fnm>Z</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Liu</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Liu</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yoshikawa</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>53</volume>
				<fpage>1582</fpage>
				<lpage>1586</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1248/cpb.53.1582</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16327195</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B18">
				<title>
					<p>A study on genetic variation between wild and cultivated populations of <it>Paeonia lactiflora </it>Pall</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhou</snm>
						<fnm>HT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hu</snm>
						<fnm>SL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Guo</snm>
						<fnm>BL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Feng</snm>
						<fnm>XF</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yan</snm>
						<fnm>YN</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>JS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Yaoxue Xuebao</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>37</volume>
				<fpage>383</fpage>
				<lpage>388</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B19">
				<title>
					<p>Chemical analysis of Radix <it>Astragali </it>(Huangqi) in China: a comparison with its adulterants and seasonal variations</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ma</snm>
						<fnm>XQ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shi</snm>
						<fnm>Q</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Duan</snm>
						<fnm>JA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dong</snm>
						<fnm>TT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tsim</snm>
						<fnm>KW</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Agric Food Chem</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>50</volume>
				<fpage>4861</fpage>
				<lpage>4866</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/jf0202279</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12166972</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B20">
				<title>
					<p>Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of essential oils from <it>Thymus spinulosus </it>Ten. (Lamiaceae)</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>De Feo</snm>
						<fnm>V</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bruno</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Tahiri</snm>
						<fnm>B</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Napolitano</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Senatore</snm>
						<fnm>F</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Agric Food Chem</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>51</volume>
				<fpage>3849</fpage>
				<lpage>3853</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/jf021232f</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12797754</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B21">
				<title>
					<p>Regional and racial specificities in sorghum germplasm assessed with DNA markers</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>de Oliveira</snm>
						<fnm>AC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Richter</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bennetzen</snm>
						<fnm>JL</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Genome</source>
				<pubdate>1996</pubdate>
				<volume>39</volume>
				<fpage>579</fpage>
				<lpage>587</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8675002</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B22">
				<title>
					<p>Biochemical activities of extracts from <it>Hypericum perforatum </it>L. 4th Communication: influence of different cultivation methods</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Denke</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schempp</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Mann</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Schneider</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Elstner</snm>
						<fnm>EF</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Arzneimittelforschung</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>49</volume>
				<fpage>120</fpage>
				<lpage>125</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">10083980</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B23">
				<title>
					<p>Effects of growth conditions and processing on <it>Rehmannia glutinosa </it>using fingerprint strategy</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Chang</snm>
						<fnm>WT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Thissen</snm>
						<fnm>U</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ehlert</snm>
						<fnm>KA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Koek</snm>
						<fnm>MM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jellema</snm>
						<fnm>RH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hankemeier</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>van der Greef</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta Med</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>72</volume>
				<fpage>458</fpage>
				<lpage>467</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-2005-916241</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16557461</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B24">
				<title>
					<p>Research on the quality of original plants and material medicine of Cortex <it>Paeoniae</it></p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Guo</snm>
						<fnm>BL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Basang</snm>
						<fnm>D</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Xiao</snm>
						<fnm>PG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hong</snm>
						<fnm>DY</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>27</volume>
				<fpage>654</fpage>
				<lpage>657</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">12776563</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B25">
				<title>
					<p>Genetic authentication of ginseng and other traditional Chinese medicine</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hon</snm>
						<fnm>CC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chow</snm>
						<fnm>YC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zeng</snm>
						<fnm>FY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Leung</snm>
						<fnm>FC</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Acta Pharmacol Sin</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>24</volume>
				<fpage>841</fpage>
				<lpage>846</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">12956929</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B26">
				<title>
					<p>Changes of dehydroandrographolide's contents of andrographis tablet in the process of production</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Huang</snm>
						<fnm>XD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Su</snm>
						<fnm>ZR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lai</snm>
						<fnm>XP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lin</snm>
						<fnm>SH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Dong</snm>
						<fnm>XB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Liu</snm>
						<fnm>ZQ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Xie</snm>
						<fnm>PS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>27</volume>
				<fpage>911</fpage>
				<lpage>913</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">12776529</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B27">
				<title>
					<p>Effect of processing on essential components of <it>Raphnus sativus </it>L</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>GH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi</source>
				<pubdate>1993</pubdate>
				<volume>18</volume>
				<fpage>89</fpage>
				<lpage>91</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">8323706</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B28">
				<title>
					<p>Influence of process methods on contents of chemical component Radix Polygoni Multiflori</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Liu</snm>
						<fnm>ZL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Song</snm>
						<fnm>ZQ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>SL</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>30</volume>
				<fpage>336</fpage>
				<lpage>340</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">15806963</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B29">
				<title>
					<p>Studies on the method for the processing roots of cultivated <it>Saposhnikovia divaricata</it></p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Sun</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cao</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Meng</snm>
						<fnm>XC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>XJ</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>28</volume>
				<fpage>402</fpage>
				<lpage>404</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">15139121</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B30">
				<title>
					<p>Effects of processing on contents of saccharides in huangqi</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Tian</snm>
						<fnm>YH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jin</snm>
						<fnm>FY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lei</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>28</volume>
				<fpage>128</fpage>
				<lpage>129</lpage>
				<note>173.</note>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">15015283</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B31">
				<title>
					<p>Methodological studies on selectively removing toxins in <it>Aristolochiae manshuriensis </it>by chinese processing techniques</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>ZM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>You</snm>
						<fnm>LS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jiang</snm>
						<fnm>X</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>WH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>G</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Zhongguo Zhongyao Zazhi</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>30</volume>
				<fpage>1243</fpage>
				<lpage>1246</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">16245898</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B32">
				<title>
					<p>Some aspects of toxic contaminants in herbal medicines</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Chan</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Chemosphere</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>52</volume>
				<fpage>1361</fpage>
				<lpage>1371</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00471-5</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">12867165</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B33">
				<title>
					<p>Quality control for Chinese herbal drugs using DNA probe technology</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Liu</snm>
						<fnm>YP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Cao</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Komatsu</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>But</snm>
						<fnm>PP</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Yaoxue Xuebao</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>36</volume>
				<fpage>475</fpage>
				<lpage>480</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B34">
				<title>
					<p>DNA-based methods for food authentication</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Lockley</snm>
						<fnm>AK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bardsley</snm>
						<fnm>RG</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Trends Food Sci Technol</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>11</volume>
				<fpage>67</fpage>
				<lpage>77</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0924-2244(00)00049-2</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B35">
				<title>
					<p>Application of PCR-RFLP and MASA analyses on 18S ribosomal RNA gene sequence for the identification of three Ginseng drugs</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Fushimi</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Komatsu</snm>
						<fnm>K</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Isobe</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Namba</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Biol Pharm Bull</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>20</volume>
				<fpage>765</fpage>
				<lpage>769</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">9255417</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B36">
				<title>
					<p>Molecular authentication of <it>Panax ginseng </it>species by RAPD analysis and PCR-RFLP</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Um</snm>
						<fnm>JY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Chung</snm>
						<fnm>HS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kim</snm>
						<fnm>MS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Na</snm>
						<fnm>HJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kwon</snm>
						<fnm>HJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kim</snm>
						<fnm>JJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lee</snm>
						<fnm>KM</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lee</snm>
						<fnm>SJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lim</snm>
						<fnm>JP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Do</snm>
						<fnm>KR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hwang</snm>
						<fnm>WJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lyu</snm>
						<fnm>YS</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>An</snm>
						<fnm>NH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kim</snm>
						<fnm>HM</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Biol Pharm Bull</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>24</volume>
				<fpage>872</fpage>
				<lpage>875</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1248/bpb.24.872</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11510476</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B37">
				<title>
					<p>Identification of <it>Fritillaria pallidiflora </it>using diagnostic PCR and PCR-RFLP based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>CZ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Ding</snm>
						<fnm>JY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jin</snm>
						<fnm>GQ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yuan</snm>
						<fnm>CS</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta Med</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>71</volume>
				<fpage>384</fpage>
				<lpage>386</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-2005-864112</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">15856423</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B38">
				<title>
					<p>Identification of the crude drug atractylodes rhizome (Byaku-jutsu) and atractylodes lancea rhizome (So-jutsu) using chloroplast <it>TrnK </it>sequence as a molecular marker</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Mizukami</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Okabe</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kohda</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hiraoka</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Biol Pharm Bull</source>
				<pubdate>2000</pubdate>
				<volume>23</volume>
				<fpage>589</fpage>
				<lpage>594</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="pmpid">10823670</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B39">
				<title>
					<p>Differentiation of medicinal <it>Codonopsis </it>species from adulterants by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Fu</snm>
						<fnm>RZ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>YB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>ZT</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>But</snm>
						<fnm>PP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Li</snm>
						<fnm>N</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shaw</snm>
						<fnm>PC</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Planta Med</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>65</volume>
				<fpage>648</fpage>
				<lpage>650</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1055/s-1999-14091</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid">10575378</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B40">
				<title>
					<p>Measure of molecular diversity within the <it>Trypanosoma brucei </it>subspecies <it>Trypanosoma brucei </it>brucei and <it>Trypanosoma brucei </it>gambiense as revealed by genotypic characterization</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Agbo</snm>
						<fnm>EC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Majiwa</snm>
						<fnm>PA</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Claassen</snm>
						<fnm>EJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Roos</snm>
						<fnm>MH</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Exp Parasitol</source>
				<pubdate>2001</pubdate>
				<volume>99</volume>
				<fpage>123</fpage>
				<lpage>131</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/expr.2001.4666</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11846522</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B41">
				<title>
					<p>AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Vos</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hogers</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Bleeker</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Reijans</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>van de Lee</snm>
						<fnm>T</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hornes</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Frijters</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Pot</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Peleman</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kuiper</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
				<pubdate>1995</pubdate>
				<volume>23</volume>
				<fpage>4407</fpage>
				<lpage>4414</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">307397</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">7501463</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/23.21.4407</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B42">
				<title>
					<p>Authentication of <it>Panax ginseng </it>and <it>Panax quinquefolius </it>using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and directed amplification of minisatellite region DNA (DAMD)</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Ha</snm>
						<fnm>WY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shaw</snm>
						<fnm>PC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Liu</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yau</snm>
						<fnm>FC</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Wang</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Agric Food Chem</source>
				<pubdate>2002</pubdate>
				<volume>50</volume>
				<fpage>1871</fpage>
				<lpage>1875</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/jf011365l</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">11902926</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B43">
				<title>
					<p>Genetic variation in hemp and marijuana (<it>Cannabis sativa </it>L.) according to amplified fragment length polymorphisms</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Datwyler</snm>
						<fnm>SL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Weiblen</snm>
						<fnm>GD</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Forensic Sci</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>51</volume>
				<fpage>371</fpage>
				<lpage>375</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00061.x</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16566773</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B44">
				<title>
					<p>Genetic diversity and variation of saponin contents in <it>Panax notoginseng </it>roots from a single farm</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Hong</snm>
						<fnm>DY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lau</snm>
						<fnm>AJ</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yeo</snm>
						<fnm>CL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Liu</snm>
						<fnm>XK</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Yang</snm>
						<fnm>CR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Koh</snm>
						<fnm>HL</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hong</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>J Agric Food Chem</source>
				<pubdate>2005</pubdate>
				<volume>53</volume>
				<fpage>8460</fpage>
				<lpage>8467</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1021/jf051248g</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">16248538</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B45">
				<title>
					<p>Heterogeneity of Chinese medical herbs in Singapore assessed by fluorescence AFLP analysis</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Yuan</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hong</snm>
						<fnm>Y</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Am J Chin Med</source>
				<pubdate>2003</pubdate>
				<volume>31</volume>
				<fpage>773</fpage>
				<lpage>779</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1142/S0192415X03001351</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">14696680</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B46">
				<title>
					<p>Analysis of intraspecific variation of Chinese <it>Carthamus tinctorius </it>L. using AFLP markers</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Zhang</snm>
						<fnm>L</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Huang</snm>
						<fnm>BB</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kai</snm>
						<fnm>GY</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Guo</snm>
						<fnm>ML</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Yaoxue Xuebao</source>
				<pubdate>2006</pubdate>
				<volume>41</volume>
				<fpage>91</fpage>
				<lpage>96</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B47">
				<title>
					<p>Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) provides molecular markers for the identification of <it>Caladium bicolor </it>cultivars</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Loh</snm>
						<fnm>JP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kiew</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kee</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gan</snm>
						<fnm>LH</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Gan</snm>
						<fnm>YY</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Ann Bot (Lond)</source>
				<pubdate>1999</pubdate>
				<volume>84</volume>
				<fpage>155</fpage>
				<lpage>161</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/anbo.1999.0903</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B48">
				<title>
					<p>Direct amplification of length polymorphisms (DALP), or how to get and characterize new genetic markers in many species</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Desmarais</snm>
						<fnm>E</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lanneluc</snm>
						<fnm>I</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Lagnel</snm>
						<fnm>J</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Nucleic Acids Res</source>
				<pubdate>1998</pubdate>
				<volume>26</volume>
				<fpage>1458</fpage>
				<lpage>1465</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubidlist>
						<pubid idtype="pmcid">147435</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">9490792</pubid>
						<pubid idtype="doi">10.1093/nar/26.6.1458</pubid>
					</pubidlist>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B49">
				<title>
					<p>Direct comparison of levels of genetic variation among barley accessions detected by RFLPs, AFLPs, SSRs and RAPDs</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Russell</snm>
						<fnm>JR</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Fuller</snm>
						<fnm>JD</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Macaulay</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Hatz</snm>
						<fnm>BG</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Jahoor</snm>
						<fnm>A</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Powell</snm>
						<fnm>W</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Waugh</snm>
						<fnm>R</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Theor Appl Genet</source>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<volume>95</volume>
				<fpage>714</fpage>
				<lpage>722</lpage>
				<xrefbib>
					<pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s001220050617</pubid>
				</xrefbib>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B50">
				<title>
					<p>AFLP analysis</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Vos</snm>
						<fnm>P</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Kuiper</snm>
						<fnm>M</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>DNA markers: protocols, applications, and overviews</source>
				<publisher>New York Wiley-Liss</publisher>
				<editor>Caetano-Anoll&#233;s G, Gresshoff PM</editor>
				<pubdate>1997</pubdate>
				<fpage>115</fpage>
				<lpage>132</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B51">
				<title>
					<p>Authentication of the Chinese drug "ku-di-dan" (herba elephantopi) and its substitutes using random-primed polymerase chain reaction (PCR)</p>
				</title>
				<aug>
					<au>
						<snm>Cao</snm>
						<fnm>H</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>But</snm>
						<fnm>PP</fnm>
					</au>
					<au>
						<snm>Shaw</snm>
						<fnm>PC</fnm>
					</au>
				</aug>
				<source>Yaoxue Xuebao</source>
				<pubdate>1996</pubdate>
				<volume>31</volume>
				<fpage>543</fpage>
				<lpage>553</lpage>
			</bibl>
			<bibl id="B52">
				<title>
					<p>Authentication of <it>Panax </it>species and 